Check out the brand new song and video - just released - Fight The Lockdown
The UK Covid 'Vaccine'
Merry Christmas everyone!
I hope you're enjoying the festive season despite the tyranny. We mustn't let them get us down. Today I wanted to share some research I've been doing on the new Pfizer 'vaccine' and the vaccine industry in general, just because it seems so Christmassy. Well no, seriously, the vaccine agenda is coming at us like a steamroller on steroids, so like it or not, we do need to be armed with knowledge.
So apparently, the Pfizer / BioNTech Covid 'vaccine' has "met all regulatory requirements", but that doesn't really mean very much when those requirements have been reduced to almost nothing. UK law has been changed to allow this dangerous madness, to indemnify Pfizer of any liability, and in October the government made changes to the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 to allow the MHRA to grant temporary authorisation of a covid-19 vaccine without needing to wait for the EMA.
Now this indemnity, which will apply to all UK Covid vaccines is very significant. You see, I'm not anti-vax, just anti-corruption, and the vaccine industry has become corrupt beyond belief. I accept that in the past, vaccines did save more lives than they injured or killed, simply because that was a requirement for profitability, otherwise the damages they had to pay out for injury or death would've bankrupted them. But as it turned out, in the US, they would've gone bankrupt anyway if Congress hadn't bailed them out in 1986 with the US National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. This indemnified the vaccine companies from any potential financial liability due to claims of injury or death. Since then any such claims are paid by the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, funded by an excise tax of 75 cents on every purchased dose of vaccine. So it doesn't matter how much harm they cause, they never pay compensation, just a tax. But who pays that tax? No doubt the vaccine companies charge what they like then the tax is paid on top by either insurance companies, private individuals or the government (taxpayer).
Added to that, the FDA is completely corrupt and captured by the industry it is supposed to regulate, so that creates the perfect business model for them. They skimp on the long drawn out and expensive safety testing, get rubber stamped approval from the FDA, then never pay a dime when things go wrong, keeping all the profit. And they do that because their business model incentivises it. So now, there are no checks and balances like in the old days, when they had to take responsibility. Hence their newer vaccines are not likely to be as safe or effective, compared to when they were incentivised to actually save lives.
Now the UK has copied the business model with Covid 'vaccines', except the compensation won't be paid for by a tax on the vaccine, because it would only be the government paying its own tax, assuming the government will pay for all these 'vaccines', so the government will just pay the compensation directly. I can see these vaccine companies rubbing their hands together with glee, dollar signs in their eyes, with an even better deal than they had in the US. And yes our regulators, the MHRA are captured too. So what does all this imply for Covid 'vaccine' safety? The mind boggles. However, in the event you are injured or killed, you will get £120,000 from the taxpayer - yippee - but even then, only if you are severely disabled (more than 60%) and can prove it was the vaccine. So I'm not sure that covers being sterilised...
So, surprise surprise, this Covid 'vaccine' made by the thoroughly corrupt Pfizer, that you wouldn't want to even buy a washing machine from, let alone a potentially life-changing 'vaccine', has only been in testing for seven months out of an absolute minimum two year study. Consequently, it's impossible to know the medium term, never mind long term effects. Developing a safe and effective vaccine normally takes many years and begins with animal studies, but they completely skipped that part too.
Plus this 'vaccine' uses mRNA technology, a brand new technology never used on humans before, so they literally want to use us as human guinea pigs!
Nothing about this is tried, tested or safe. And already we know that it's killed three people, given four Bell's Palsy, two NHS workers had an anaphylactoid reaction, a health worker in Alaska suffered a 'serious allergic reaction' and a Tennessee nurse passed out on camera minutes after taking it. To be fair, I don't know if the nurse who passed out took the Pfizer 'vaccine', but still, call me cynical, but I see a pattern emerging already. These people seem to be especially vulnerable, so why are they some of the first in line? I mean, why would you get a nurse to do a press conference ten minutes after taking it, when she has a known history of passing out at the drop of a hat? Don't you think they would've chosen someone else? Or are they making it up I wonder?
So the latest data just in, is:
Of the 112,807 receiving the Pfizer jab, 3,150 people had a health impact event, defined as, "unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work, required care from doctor or health professional". So that's 2.79 %, and within only days of receiving the 'vaccine'. See .
Then there's the concern about the possible formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” that can lead to a potentially fatal exaggerated immune reaction, especially when confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. And also there's a possible risk of permanent female infertility!
Maybe you've heard that these 'vaccines' have been rigorously tested. Well actually the trials are rigged to succeed easily, and the way protocols are designed suggests these 'vaccines' will not have a significant impact on infection rates, hospitalizations or deaths. Shockingly, preventing infection with SARS-CoV-2 is not a criterion for success, in fact the only criterion for a successful COVID-19 vaccine is reduction of symptoms shared by both COVID-19 and the common cold. So essentially it's just a Lemsip. Except Lemsips have been in widespread use for many years so we know the long term effects. I know which I'd prefer.
Then the makers don't even claim it prevents you from catching or spreading Covid, so how will that stop the 'pandemic'? And even just the way it is being forced upon us, raises the suspicion that it might not be for our benefit. I mean, why should children need protection from a 'virus' that doesn't even affect them, worth talking about. So exactly how is that for their benefit? And don't try to tell me it won't be mandatory for everybody. You just won't be able to do anything without being 'vaccinated'.
So the conclusion is; you would either be unaware of the facts, or just completely insane, to have this 'vaccine'. And you may think it's a necessary risk due to the ongoing health emergency. It's not. There is no emergency. There is no pandemic. It's completely fake. Just a hoax. All lies and propaganda.
But don't take my word for it. Take it from the tens of thousands of doctors and medical professionals speaking out. And I'm not exaggerating. Take a look at this list that I've compiled, and see what they have to say too:
Wishing you a very Happy New Year! And it really will be, once their pack of lies comes tumbling down, like a house of cards.
The only way I can include the evidence but keep the email readable, is by using footnotes. Where there is text in double quotes, that is taken directly from the linked page, so you can copy that text and search for it in the page to see it in context.
 "Ministers have also changed the law in recent weeks to give new protections to companies such as Pfizer, giving them immunity from being sued by patients in the event of any complications."
 "In October the government made changes to the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 to allow the MHRA to grant temporary authorisation of a covid-19 vaccine without needing to wait for the EMA."
 Vaccine ingredients - mRNA plus BNT162b2RNA(embedded in lipid nanoparticles):
 "Pfizer CEO admits he is 'not certain' their COVID-19 shot will prevent vaccinated people from spreading the virus"
 "On 2 December, UK regulators granted emergency-use authorization to a vaccine from drug firms Pfizer and BioNTech, just seven months after the start of clinical trials."
 "But none has demonstrated that it prevents infection altogether, or reduces the spread of the virus in a population."
 "The vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna rely on RNA encased in a lipid particle that ferries it into cells, where it is used as a template to generate a viral protein that stimulates the immune system."
 "The vaccine has completed only a few months of the two-year clinical-trial period that it will need to complete before it is approved to be sold freely on the market. As a result, health officials, clinicians and people receiving the vaccine will be watching closely for as-yet unobserved signs of danger."
 "The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination."
 "as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women."
N.B. For the following three links on mercola.com - you need to register with an email address (but nothing else) to read the article.
 "While vaccine makers insist any COVID-19 vaccine reaching the market will have undergone rigorous testing, the way trial protocols are designed suggests these vaccines will not have a significant impact on infection rates, hospitalizations or deaths"
 "Shockingly, preventing infection with SARS-CoV-2 is not a criterion for success in these vaccine trials. The only criterion for a successful COVID-19 vaccine is a reduction of symptoms shared by both COVID-19 and the common cold"
 "However, developing a safe and effective vaccine normally takes years and begins with animal studies. Given the urgency of the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccine makers are rushing into human clinical tests and circumventing lengthy animal trials."
 "Some COVID-19 vaccines use mRNA technology, which has never been licensed for use in humans and actually alters genes"
FDA is captured by industry:
 "While the U.S. Food and Drug Administration itself does not accept corporate money, it does receive money funneled via a nonprofit foundation, which receives money from other nonprofits funded by private interests"
 "According to the rules, no more than four of the 14-member board of the Reagan-Udall Foundation are supposed to be representatives of FDA-regulated industries, yet in 2017, nine of the then 13-member board had financial ties to industry at the time of their appointment"
 MHRA not independent because of conflict of interest (This links to the exact time in the video: 2:40 - 6:30):
UK Government to add COVID-19 to Vaccine Damage Payments Scheme
 "it provides a one-off, tax-free lump sum – currently £120,000 – for those suffering a severe disability as a result of a vaccine against a disease listed under the Vaccine Damage Payments Act."
 "the resulting disability amounts to severe (ie at least 60%) disablement."
 "Claims are assessed and paid where successful by the Department for Work and Pensions."
US National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986
 "NCVIA's purpose was to eliminate the potential financial liability of vaccine manufacturers due to vaccine injury claims"
US National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program
 "the program has been funded by an excise tax of 75 cents on every purchased dose of covered vaccine."
 Alaska Health Worker Suffers 'Serious Allergic Reaction':
 A very short documentary about the thoroughly corrupt Pfizer:
 Tennessee Nurse Passes Out On Camera Minutes After Taking COVID-19 Vaccine:
 A very short video about the Pfizer 'vaccine' side effects:
 Already two killed by the Pfizer 'vaccine', plus more with other Covid 'vaccines':
 Swiss Patient Dies Shortly After Receiving Pfizer COVID Vaccine
Check out the brand new song and video - just released - Fight The Lockdown